Monday, February 3, 2014

Catholic Church officially condemns Socialism

Pope Francis issued only an “Apostolic Exhortation” recently, which contains sections that Rush Limbaugh labeled "pure Marxism."

      But in 1931, Pope Pius XI issued a more authoritative Encyclical to the Catholic Church “Quadragesimo Anno” http://xroads.virginia.edu/~ma01/Kidd/thesis/pdf/quadragesimo.pdf , which said in paragraph 10 that

“socialism … proposing a remedy far worse than the evil itself, would have plunged human society into great dangers.” 

Pope Pius XI further pronounced:  “Socialism, if it remains truly Socialism, even after it has yielded to truth and justice on the points which we have mentioned, cannot be reconciled with the teachings of the Catholic Church because its concept of society itself is utterly foreign to Christian truth.”
 
In paragraph 120 of “Quadragesimo Anno,” the Pope authoritatively pronounces that socialism “is based nevertheless on a theory of human society peculiar to itself and irreconcilable with true Christianity. Religious socialism, Christian socialism, are contradictory terms; no one can be at the same time a good Catholic and a true socialist.”

Sunday, January 26, 2014


Friday, January 24, 2014

Five Secrets: The Proven Neuroscience Behind Persuading Voters [from liberal NetRoots]

Conservatives need to communicate the reality: Liberals are ideological fanatics who despise the average American, his or her family, and everything they believe in. Liberals have not only ruined everything they have managed -- like Detroit and every inner city -- but liberals are passionately committed to tearing down the entire world of the average American. 
"Human beings are wired to tell and connect through stories. Facts and figures alone will never convince people you are right."
http://www.netrootsfoundation.org/2013/05/five-secrets-the-proven-neuroscience-behind-persuading-voters/

Aetna Insurance CEO: We May Have to Pull Out of Obamacare, or Heavily Hike Premiums


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/01/24/aetna-ceo-we-may-have-to-pull-out-of-obamacare-or-heavily-hike-premiums-n1783744?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm

Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini told CNBC on Wednesday that Obamacare has failed to attract the uninsured, and he offered a scenario in which the insurance company could be forced to pull out of program. The company will be submitting Obamacare rates for 2015 on May 15. "Are they going to be double-digit [increases] or are we going to get beat up because they're double-digit or are we just going to have to pull out of the program?" Bertolini asked..."Those questions can't be answered until we see the population we have today. And we really don't have a good view on that." He said that so far, Obamacare has just shifted people who were insured in the individual market to the public exchanges where they could get a better deal on a subsidy for coverage. "We see only 11 percent of the population is actually people that were firmly uninsured that are now insured. So [it] didn't really eat into the uninsured population." 
 Jonah Goldberg poses the rhetorical question that many Americans are asking themselves: So what was the point of Obamacare, again

Festival yanks pro-fracking documentary; will show films critical of industry


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/23/festival-yanks-pro-fracking-documentary-will-show-/

A Minnesota film festival is being accused of pushing a political agenda by yanking a pro-fracking documentary from its lineup while keeping two anti-fracking films on the program.


Organizers of the Frozen River Film Festival in Winona, Minn., decided last week to cut “FrackNation,” a widely discussed 2013 documentary about hydraulic fracturing, reportedly citing concerns about the film’s financial links to the oil and gas industry and the filmmakers’ inability to attend the screening.


‘Blind’ Man Caught in Disability Fraud After Seen Driving a Speed Boat

Lawrence Popp sentenced to one year in prison for defrauding government
http://freebeacon.com/blind-man-caught-in-disability-fraud-after-seen-driving-a-speed-boat/

A “blind” Wisconsin man’s $175,000 Social Security disability fraud scheme ended when federal agents caught him driving a speedboat, according to the inspector general.


This is what liberals want us to go into debt for

TIME Magazine: Exclusive: Republican Party Calls For End To NSA Domestic Phone Records Program

http://swampland.time.com/2014/01/24/exclusive-republican-party-calls-for-investigation-into-nsa-snooping/

In the latest indication of a growing libertarian wing of the GOP, the Republican National Committee passed a resolution Friday calling for an investigation into the “gross infringement” of Americans’ rights by National Security Agency programs that were revealed by Edward Snowden.


The resolution also calls on on Republican members of Congress to enact amendments to the Section 215 program that currently allows the spy agency to collect records of almost every domestic telephone call. The amendment should make clear that “blanket surveillance of the Internet activity, phone records and correspondence — electronic, physical, and otherwise — of any person residing in the U.S. is prohibited by law and that violations can be reviewed in adversarial proceedings before a public court,” the resolution reads.


Growing libertarian wing?   As if the GOP would ever have tolerated such outrageous behavior as NSA spying.

STEAL LIBERAL TACTICS

for effective political campaigning on the internet

Netroots Nation: 10 Ways To Win The Internets

http://www.upworthy.com/upworthy-netroots-nation-10-ways-to-win-the-internets

Read carefully through the entire powerpoint presentation.  It is about how to get more people to share your post, to make it go viral.

Saturday, January 11, 2014

Jesus was Middle Class: To Bill O'Reilly and Pope Francis


http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/12/jesus_was_middle_class.html
AMERICAN THINKER
December 29, 2013

Jesus was Middle Class

By Jonathon Moseley
Bill O'Reilly's recent book Killing Jesus reflects a traditional stereotype that everyone in the Gospel story was poor. Among many historically inaccuracies, O'Reilly writes in his Chapter 5 that fish and red meat would be rare in Jesus' diet in Nazareth and that many Galileans suffered from malnutrition.

Yet one of the names for the Sea of Galilee, Genneseret, means, "garden of riches." Consider the historian Josephus' contemporary description of Galilee:
"Thanks to the rich soil, there is not a plant that does not flourish there, and the inhabitants grow everything...walnuts...flourish in abundance, as do palms...side by side with figs and olives...not only does it produce the most surprisingly diverse fruits; it maintains a continuous supply. Those royal fruits the grape and fig it furnishes for ten months on end." (The Jewish War, Josephus Flavius, Book 3, Ch. VI)
Yet somehow the Gospel story is not complete without portraying Jesus as unfamiliar with a good meal. Recall that the abundant fish of the Mediterranean and lakes were shared among a much smaller human population then and were not overfished. The trade in Mediterranean and Sea of Galilee fish was region-wide. The large number of herders in the region made red meat available. Josephus' mention specifically of walnuts, figs, and olives suggests wealth, not any lack of grains and fruits.

Over the centuries, church thinking has turned poverty into nearly a sacrament. So it becomes impossible to refer to people in the Bible without exaggerating how poor they were. Holiness demands proof of poverty to establish legitimacy.

Glamorizing poverty encourages more suffering and the spread of poverty by depriving the poor of opportunities for practical help. The best thing we can do for the poor is help them no longer be poor, not laud them in song and story. The poor would rather have a new business to give them a job than hear poems and toasts romanticizing their poverty.
Recall that the Catholic Church operates the largest network of non-government schools in the world. Training the poor with marketable skills -- maybe a vocation like carpentry -- would be easily within Pope Francis' grasp. The popular Pope would need only to mount a massive fundraising campaign rivaling the $74 billion-dollar Clinton Global Initiative. No one knows what Bill Clinton does with billions bilked from gullible celebrities. But schools for the poor would be an easy sell.

Jesus was a skilled craftsman, a carpenter, in a region where wood was more of a premium material than we think of today. Americans are used to vast forests. Then, carpentry was more of an art. Modern tools, fittings, stains, glues, and measurement were not available. One could not buy a bag of standardized ten-penny nails at Home Depot, but painstakingly fashioned wooden pins one at a time. One could not afford to waste wood. In Galilee, valuable cedar was imported from Lebanon.

The Bible reports that Jesus was referred to as "the carpenter's son." His father Joseph would have trained his first-born. Children worked. Apprenticeship in a trade was their education, along with study of the scriptures. One would have to view Jesus as a totally irresponsible son not to faithfully and diligently continue the family carpentry shop -- at least before His ministry for His other Father. In fact, Jesus preached on a son's responsibility to his parents.

Joseph lived among Jews but had rich Greeks among his clientele. Across the valley from Nazareth was the huge Greek luxury city of Sepphoris where wealthy ruling-class households offered a steady demand for upscale, high-priced furniture. Rich communities in the Eastern Roman Empire demanded luxury on a scale that even our decadent ruling class today can scarcely imagine. A carpentry business in the vicinity of Sepphoris would attract high-paying clients with great quantities of business.

So Jesus was middle class, probably upper middle-class, on a level comparable to an accountant or an architect in today's society. O'Reilly allows that Jesus probably worked in the Sepphoris building boom in its later years, yet thinks Jesus rarely ate fish or meat. If Jesus worked on-site building houses, he spent a lot of time around wealthy Greeks. He could afford to eat hearty, would dress suitably for a worker visiting an upscale community, and would maintain good relations in business with rich people.

The Bible tells us that at Jesus' birth, Joseph and Mary were staying in a stable with the animals and laid the newborn Jesus in a manger. But that was not because they were poor, but "because there was no room at the inn." Clearly, Joseph was not so rich to afford two camels for the journey, but he was not so poor as to go without a donkey for Mary to ride, plus other costs of the trip. Bethlehem was overcrowded because of the edict of Caesar Augustus requiring everyone to register for a census in their home city. Pregnant Mary's journey on a donkey was certainly slow. Without cell phones to call ahead and make a reservation on a credit card, they arrived in Bethlehem later than others. Had there been a room available, Joseph would have rented it. But that wasn't God's plan.

Elitists assume that anyone who does not live in a city like Manhattan must be an ignorant country rube. Some agricultural regions overflow with prosperity as the bread baskets supplying cities. Yet they are assumed to be eating dirt.

Pope Francis' Christmas message repeated the canard that Jesus' birth was announced to shepherds who in society were considered "among the last, the outcast." But Israel's greatest icons from Abraham to Jacob (Israel) to King David were shepherds. Some speculate that shepherds' duties kept them from religious observances, so they were unclean. But almost every occupation demanded careful preparation for the Sabbath and festivals. Most Jews had livestock or animals to feed every day, yet found a way to work around that during religious events.

Of course, the intent is to make everyone feel welcome. This is all an attempt to make Christianity more accessible. Without question, Christianity offers hope for the poor and downtrodden as a central tenet. The relevance of wealth and poverty in the Kingdom of God is that they are irrelevant. Unlike other, prior religions, one's importance in this life means absolutely nothing to God.

Jesus spent a lot of time demolishing with harsh words the strong belief that the rich and powerful of His day were more favored by God than the masses. Moreover, God will compensate the faithful in paradise for whatever they lack and suffer here on Earth.
A vital and cherished principle of Christianity is that all of humanity stands on equal footing, regardless of social class, wealth, nationality, education, or background. Giving hope to those who are poor and suffering, when life is hard and unsatisfying, is one of the greatest legacies of Jesus Christ to humanity.

However, the idolatry of poverty hinders a clear understanding of Christianity. Jesus preached devotion to God above all else. But the poverty cult exalts being poor, not worship of God. In fact, God is downplayed, ignored, and forgotten. The only "poor" person who doesn't matter to the poverty cult is Jesus Christ.

Furthermore, Jesus taught that anything can be a sinful trap. It is not only material wealth which tempts us. Jesus famously taught that we cannot serve two masters. But money was only one example of such divided loyalty. Christianity means that God is Lord and King of all. Money isn't everything.


Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/12/jesus_was_middle_class.html#ixzz2osAlpiaq
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Saturday, December 28, 2013

Gospel accounts of Jesus' Life Written within 8 Years of Jesus' death

Never forget:   The Gospel of Luke was written to "Most Excellent Theophilus" who was High Priest 4-8 years after Jesus' crucifixion.  The Gospel of Luke was written within 8 years of Jesus' death. 

Luke tells us that others -- MANY -- had already written other books before him.  He says many have undertaken to write an account.  So Luke is probably the LAST of the gospels written, or at least there were "many" written accounts within a few years of Jesus' death to assist in writing the other gospels.  

HOWEVER -- "scholars" cannot accept that Jesus in 33 AD could have known the future and foretold the destruction of the Jewish temple in 70 AD.  Therefore, atheists and agnostics with academic degrees have tried mightily to argue that the gospels were written much later, so that they can avoid the divinity of Jesus Christ knowing the future. 

Also, remember that under Roman occupation, Jewish officials were chosen or approved by Rome.  So the Jewish officials were often Hellenized Jews acceptable to Rome, and they would take on Greek names in keeping with political winds and trends.

Friday, December 20, 2013

WAR BEGINS: SLANDERING CONSERVATIVES HAS STARTED

The attacks have begun.  The Republican establishment in the U.S.A. has now actually started the shooting war in the 2014 primary elections they have been threatening against conservative candidates for Congress.

“Hopefully we’ll go into eight to 10 races and beat the snot out of them,” said former Rep. Steve LaTourette of Ohio.  His new political group, Defending Main Street, plans to raise $8 million to defeat tea-party candidates and elect moderate Republicans instead. “We’re going to be very aggressive and we’re going to get in their faces.”  LaTourette was a close ally of moderate Republican Speaker John Boehner in the U.S. House.

On December 19, 2013, the Weekly Standard launched a smear http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/spousal-rape-defending-republican-considering-running-house_771483.html – what used to be called a “lie” in the quaint old days – against Virginia State Senator Dick Black.  The smear was promoted by The Drudge Report linking to the story.  Drudge refused to take down the smear after many protests.  It is not a story about news, but the kind of opposition research spread by election campaigns going negative.

The story consisted of posting a campaign ad by a Democrat opponent in 2011, under an extremely inflammatory headline.  Dick Black won that campaign in 2011 with 57% https://www.voterinfo.sbe.virginia.gov/election/DATA/2011/EB178FD6-875D-4B0D-A295-900A0482F523/Official/7_s.shtml of the vote.  The story – and the headline – suggests that Dick Black would be unelectable in 2014 if nominated for U.S. Congress.  Yet the Democrat Shawn Mitchell who ran the TV ad in 2011 lost with only 42.8% of the vote.

What’s the occasion?  On December 17, 2013, seventeen-term moderate Virginia Congressman Frank Wolf announced he will not seek re-election on November 4, 2014.  So Virginia’s Tenth Congressional District in Northern Virginia will now be an open battle in 2014. 

Former JAG attorney Col. Dick Black – a skilled campaigner who moves quickly – announced an exploratory committee. Then Delegate Bob Marshall dropped out of consideration and endorsed Black.  Although Black’s political career was very active long before the tea party, he might be counted tea party consistent.

That same Tuesday when Wolf announced, an important website Virginia Virtucon http://virginiavirtucon.wordpress.com/ posted a poll with a long list of potential candidates.  Virginia Delegate Barbara Comstock and Senator Dick Black have been trading first and second place.  The site is followed by very politically involved Virginia activists.  So it suddenly looked like conservative Dick Black could shape up into a leading contender.

The smear accuses Col. Dick Black of supporting husbands raping their wives, that Black opposed laws against spousal rape.  So we have Bill Kristol’s magazine spreading the liberal “war on women” scam. This is not the first time the Weekly Standard has taken point for inaccurate hatchet jobs on conservative candidates.

However, incredibly, Dick Black actually voted for the bill in question, H.B. 488.  On February 7, 2002, then Delegate Black pointed out problems with the bill – but voted for it after those problems were fixed.

Furthermore, Senator Black is the only member of the General Assembly who actually prosecuted a case of spousal rape – successfully -- as a former JAG officer in the military. The Judge Advocate General attorney prosecuted many men guilty of domestic violence in general.

In the 2002 floor speech replayed in the Democrat campaign ad, it is unmistakably clear that Dick Black was pointing out that the law was unworkable as drafted. Black obviously was not arguing for spousal rape or the legal opportunity for it.  It is crystal clear that Black was identifying – as a former prosecutor – how the law would have problems in the courtroom from a prosecutor’s perspective.  It was rewritten and polished.  Black then voted for it, all within days.

Some campaign experts like Rick Shaftan consider the “10th C.D.” a safe Republican seat heading in to a 2014 Republican tidal wave, despite narrowly voting for Mitt Romney in 2012 and voting for Barack Obama in 2008.  So any Republican will probably win Frank Wolf’s U.S. House seat if nominated, assuming a competent campaign.

Oddly, the Republican establishment keeps coming up with the completely “new” idea of smearing conservatives.  Year after year, they keep announcing that “this time” the GOP needs to do a better job “vetting” candidates.  Yet the establishment has always attacked conservative candidates, pointing out weaknesses real or imagined.  What GOP insiders want to do “this time” – as a “new” idea – is the same thing they do every election cycle.

Karl Rove’s “Conservative Victory Project” was created to “start by intensely vetting prospective contenders for Congressional races to try to weed out candidates who are seen as too flawed to win general elections.”  Conservative icon Brent Bozell responded by sending an email http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/03/14/first-on-cnn-tea-party-activists-bomb-email-list-of-crossroads-donors/comment-page-1/ to Karl Rove’s donors warning that they wasted their money:  “Now, in an attempt to explain the astonishingly low return on the hundreds of millions of dollars investment in Crossroads, Karl Rove and others are attempting to blame conservatives and the tea party.”  And: "Meanwhile, more moderate candidates like Tommy Thompson, Heather Wilson, Rick Berg, and Denny Rehberg went down to defeat despite significant support from Crossroads."

Establishment Republicans not only vote for bigger government, more spending, higher deficits, and ever-expanding regulation.  They also openly express their contempt for conservatives.  Insiders have always attacked the tea party.

Ironically, retiring Congressman Frank Wolf is a fiscal moderate weak on the budget and government spending.  Heritage Action ranks Wolf at 46%.  Americans for Prosperity rates the Congressman at 56% (lifetime 66%).  The National Taxpayer’s Union rates Wolf with a “C” or a score of 64% -- 227th out of 435 for fiscal discipline.   The consistently soft-on-RINO’s American Conservative Union ranks Wolf at 79.62%. 

Yet Wolf is supported by most tea party members in Northern Virginia.  The Northern Virginia Tea Party, of which this author is a member, actually split in 2010 over the desire of some leaders to attack Frank Wolf.  The rank and file of the tea party overwhelmingly demanded support for Wolf’s re-election despite his deficiencies on budget issues.

So how does a moderate Republican enjoy support from the tea party?   Well, Frank Wolf doesn’t go around attacking conservatives the way Karl Rove, Steve LaTourette and others do.  Wolf reaches out to and shows up at tea party meetings whenever possible.  Wolf makes all factions of the GOP genuinely feel that he wants to work with all of them.  So, perfect or not, Wolf is accepted.

The truth is that the grassroots just isn’t listening to anything the insiders have to say.  In every election campaign where we are now told that candidates were not “vetted” fully.  But the establishment was already attacking those conservative candidates months ahead. 

Republican primary voters simply didn’t care what the insiders have to say.  It is false that primary voters didn’t know about conservative candidates’ pros and cons.  The voters were simply not interested in the establishment’s arguments and reasoning.  In fact, the more the insiders attack the conservative, the more the grassroots rushes to elect the conservative.  In 2010 in Delaware, for example, the more Karl Rove insisted that the grassroots must not vote for Christine O’Donnell, the more enthusiastically they lined up to poke a thumb in Karl Rove’s eye.

Monday, December 16, 2013

World Net Daily Article: Jesus Christ is a Capitalist

Exclusive: Jonathon Moseley sets pope straight on Bible's condemnation of socialism
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/jesus-christ-is-a-capitalist/#TOaxruRiPXGUxBu3.99

Jesus Christ is a capitalist

Exclusive: Jonathon Moseley sets pope straight on Bible's condemnation of socialism
By Jonathan Moseley
We discover in the New Testament, in Luke Chapter 12:13-14:
“Someone in the crowd said to Him [Jesus Christ], ‘Teacher, tell my brother to divide the family inheritance with me.’ But He said to him, ‘Man, who appointed Me a judge or arbitrator over you?’”
In just one verse, we see that God rejects the left-wing “Jesus Christ supported socialism” heresy. When Jesus was asked to support redistribution of wealth – to tell one brother to share the family inheritance with the other – Jesus refused. Jesus would never support government or a church stealing property by force to give it to a stranger. He would not even intervene for one man to share his own family’s wealth with his own brother.
Obviously, Jesus would sternly warn the brother hoarding wealth against greed, dishonesty and defrauding his family. But Jesus preached to the person in front of him about how to live right.  Jesus was never teaching one person what is wrong with someone else (except to clarify how the listener should behave by contrast).
One truth shines out from the Bible: Jesus spoke to the individual, never to government or government policy. Jesus was a capitalist, preaching personal responsibility, not a socialist.
Pope Francis condemned capitalism. Some argue that Francis’ Spanish-language Apostolic Exhortation was mistranslated. But Francis is not among those disputing that translation.  Moreover, corrected translations are no better.
Francis argues for dependence upon government to redistribute wealth. And con artists in the U.S. are seizing on the opportunity to spread the misery of socialism. Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin this week called Pope Francis on his mangling of economics. Then author Reza Aslan struck back in the Washington Post, claiming that Jesus was a socialist.
But we have to define our terms:
  • By “socialism,” we must understand “theft.” A socialist government uses brute force, backed up by guns, to steal property from some people to give it to others.Pope Francis reflects the wish that governments might better organize society. But governments cannot do that apart from the threat of violence to enforce their schemes. Would Jesus endorse the violence needed for government intervention?
  • By capitalism, we mean individual initiative under freedom, with the right to use what people own and to reap the fruits of one’s labor and initiative. Capitalist business must necessarily benefit society, because private businesses have no power to force anyone to buy their products or services. The consumer is king. Consumers won’t buy unless the purchase benefits them. To reinforce that central pillar of capitalism, laws against lying and fraud are proper and necessary. The consumer must be able to know and understand what he is buying and what it truly costs. The same applies to employment.
  • We reject crony capitalism and monopolies. That is what the Vatican obviously believes capitalism means. When corrupt governments are entangled with businesses, then transactions are no longer voluntary. Crony capitalism is what most people experience in Francis’ native Argentina, throughout Latin America and much of the Third World. The benefit to society is absent without informed consent.
We know that Jesus condemns crony capitalism. That’s partly what the incident at the temple was all about in Matthew 21, when Jesus overturned the tables of money-changers. Some think money-changers were bankers. Actually they exchanged one currency for another. The temple priests required that special temple coins had to be used to give mandatory tithes. So worshipers had to exchange their secular money. But the money-changers were defrauding people with a dishonest exchange rate.
Yet Jesus specifically supported the concept of capitalism. In Matthew 25:15-18, Jesus teaches what the (His) Kingdom of God is like:
“To one he gave five talents, to another, two, and to another, one, each according to his own ability; and he went on his journey. Immediately the one who had received the five talents went and traded with them, and gained five more talents. In the same manner the one who had received the two talents gained two more. But he who received the one talent went away, and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money.”
Jesus is clearly using money as a metaphor for making the most of all of life’s opportunities, abilities and moments. Yet in teaching us how we should live, Jesus agrees that a man who traded with investment capital and earned profits is praised and rewarded by his master, a type for God, and given increased authority. Most striking is what Jesus says to the man who was too afraid to take a chance with the one talent of gold entrusted to him. Jesus endorses the concept of earning interest for profit.
Matthew 25:27-28: “Then you ought to have put my money in the bank, and on my arrival I would have received my money back with interest. Therefore take away the talent from him, and give it to the one who has the ten talents.”
By contrast, in any of the versions, in paragraph 202, Pope Francis attacks markets. In paragraph 204, the pope explicitly rejects the “invisible hand” of the market, which has created the greatest prosperity in human history, as a “poison.”
In paragraph 58, Pope Francis argues that reform requires “an energetic change of attitude on the part of political leaders.” That directly contradicts Jesus’ strategy of changing individual hearts one soul at a time. The Pope’s Apostolic Exhortation was titled “The Joy of Evangelism.” If Francis had stayed focused on encouraging evangelism, that would have served both God and man. The Catholic Church does not seem to really believe that evangelism can improve society.
In paragraph 55, Francis blames poverty and unequal wealth on “ideologies which defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation.” But there was also poverty in Jesus’ day, when government tightly regulated the economy.
In paragraph 56, Francis argues for government management of business, condemning as sinful and as “tyranny” those who “reject the right of states, entrusted to watch for the common good, to exercise any form of control” over the economy. Paragraphs 58 and 205 are similar. The pope says capitalism “tends to devour everything in order to yield increased profits.”
In John 18:36, “Jesus answered, ‘My kingdom is not of this world.’” Everyone kept confusing what Jesus was saying as being political, to change government leaders or its philosophy. In Acts 1, the disciples wanted to know if – finally – Jesus was going to change the governance of Israel by overthrowing the Romans. Jesus rebuffed such ideas:
Acts 1:6-7: “So when they had come together, they were asking Him, saying, ‘Lord, is it at this time You are restoring the kingdom to Israel?’ He said to them, ‘It is not for you to know times or epochs which the Father has fixed by His own authority …’”
In paragraphs 57 and 203, Pope Francis decries capitalism for its “manipulation and debasement of the person.” Yet that is exactly what socialism does. Only capitalism exalts the individual amidst personal liberty and allows each person to achieve his or her full potential.
Worst of all, this controversy encourages misery, poverty and the destruction of human lives. Jesus Christ is weeping in heaven hearing Christians espouse a socialist philosophy that has created suffering and poverty around the world. It is impossible to love one’s neighbor as yourself without fighting against socialism, meaning government meddling in private lives.

Jonathon Moseley is a Virginia business and criminal defense attorney. Moseley is also a co-host with the “Conservative Commandos” radio show, a member of the Northern Virginia Tea Party and executive director of American Border Control. He studied Physics at Hampshire College, earned a degree in Finance from the University of Florida and a law degree from George Mason University in Virginia. Moseley promoted Reagan’s anti-missile defense plans and foreign policy at High Frontier and the Center for Peace in Freedom. He worked five years at the U.S. Department of Education, including at the Center for Choice in Education.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/jesus-christ-is-a-capitalist/#TOaxruRiPXGUxBu3.99
We discover in the New Testament, in Luke Chapter 12:13-14:
“Someone in the crowd said to Him [Jesus Christ], ‘Teacher, tell my brother to divide the family inheritance with me.’ But He said to him, ‘Man, who appointed Me a judge or arbitrator over you?’”
In just one verse, we see that God rejects the left-wing “Jesus Christ supported socialism” heresy. When Jesus was asked to support redistribution of wealth – to tell one brother to share the family inheritance with the other – Jesus refused. Jesus would never support government or a church stealing property by force to give it to a stranger. He would not even intervene for one man to share his own family’s wealth with his own brother.
Obviously, Jesus would sternly warn the brother hoarding wealth against greed, dishonesty and defrauding his family. But Jesus preached to the person in front of him about how to live right.  Jesus was never teaching one person what is wrong with someone else (except to clarify how the listener should behave by contrast).
One truth shines out from the Bible: Jesus spoke to the individual, never to government or government policy. Jesus was a capitalist, preaching personal responsibility, not a socialist.
Pope Francis condemned capitalism. Some argue that Francis’ Spanish-language Apostolic Exhortation was mistranslated. But Francis is not among those disputing that translation.  Moreover, corrected translations are no better.
Francis argues for dependence upon government to redistribute wealth. And con artists in the U.S. are seizing on the opportunity to spread the misery of socialism. Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin this week called Pope Francis on his mangling of economics. Then author Reza Aslan struck back in the Washington Post, claiming that Jesus was a socialist.
But we have to define our terms:
  • By “socialism,” we must understand “theft.” A socialist government uses brute force, backed up by guns, to steal property from some people to give it to others.Pope Francis reflects the wish that governments might better organize society. But governments cannot do that apart from the threat of violence to enforce their schemes. Would Jesus endorse the violence needed for government intervention?
  • By capitalism, we mean individual initiative under freedom, with the right to use what people own and to reap the fruits of one’s labor and initiative. Capitalist business must necessarily benefit society, because private businesses have no power to force anyone to buy their products or services. The consumer is king. Consumers won’t buy unless the purchase benefits them. To reinforce that central pillar of capitalism, laws against lying and fraud are proper and necessary. The consumer must be able to know and understand what he is buying and what it truly costs. The same applies to employment.
  • We reject crony capitalism and monopolies. That is what the Vatican obviously believes capitalism means. When corrupt governments are entangled with businesses, then transactions are no longer voluntary. Crony capitalism is what most people experience in Francis’ native Argentina, throughout Latin America and much of the Third World. The benefit to society is absent without informed consent.
We know that Jesus condemns crony capitalism. That’s partly what the incident at the temple was all about in Matthew 21, when Jesus overturned the tables of money-changers. Some think money-changers were bankers. Actually they exchanged one currency for another. The temple priests required that special temple coins had to be used to give mandatory tithes. So worshipers had to exchange their secular money. But the money-changers were defrauding people with a dishonest exchange rate.
Yet Jesus specifically supported the concept of capitalism. In Matthew 25:15-18, Jesus teaches what the (His) Kingdom of God is like:
“To one he gave five talents, to another, two, and to another, one, each according to his own ability; and he went on his journey. Immediately the one who had received the five talents went and traded with them, and gained five more talents. In the same manner the one who had received the two talents gained two more. But he who received the one talent went away, and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money.”
Jesus is clearly using money as a metaphor for making the most of all of life’s opportunities, abilities and moments. Yet in teaching us how we should live, Jesus agrees that a man who traded with investment capital and earned profits is praised and rewarded by his master, a type for God, and given increased authority. Most striking is what Jesus says to the man who was too afraid to take a chance with the one talent of gold entrusted to him. Jesus endorses the concept of earning interest for profit.
Matthew 25:27-28: “Then you ought to have put my money in the bank, and on my arrival I would have received my money back with interest. Therefore take away the talent from him, and give it to the one who has the ten talents.”
By contrast, in any of the versions, in paragraph 202, Pope Francis attacks markets. In paragraph 204, the pope explicitly rejects the “invisible hand” of the market, which has created the greatest prosperity in human history, as a “poison.”
In paragraph 58, Pope Francis argues that reform requires “an energetic change of attitude on the part of political leaders.” That directly contradicts Jesus’ strategy of changing individual hearts one soul at a time. The Pope’s Apostolic Exhortation was titled “The Joy of Evangelism.” If Francis had stayed focused on encouraging evangelism, that would have served both God and man. The Catholic Church does not seem to really believe that evangelism can improve society.
In paragraph 55, Francis blames poverty and unequal wealth on “ideologies which defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation.” But there was also poverty in Jesus’ day, when government tightly regulated the economy.
In paragraph 56, Francis argues for government management of business, condemning as sinful and as “tyranny” those who “reject the right of states, entrusted to watch for the common good, to exercise any form of control” over the economy. Paragraphs 58 and 205 are similar. The pope says capitalism “tends to devour everything in order to yield increased profits.”
In John 18:36, “Jesus answered, ‘My kingdom is not of this world.’” Everyone kept confusing what Jesus was saying as being political, to change government leaders or its philosophy. In Acts 1, the disciples wanted to know if – finally – Jesus was going to change the governance of Israel by overthrowing the Romans. Jesus rebuffed such ideas:
Acts 1:6-7: “So when they had come together, they were asking Him, saying, ‘Lord, is it at this time You are restoring the kingdom to Israel?’ He said to them, ‘It is not for you to know times or epochs which the Father has fixed by His own authority …’”
In paragraphs 57 and 203, Pope Francis decries capitalism for its “manipulation and debasement of the person.” Yet that is exactly what socialism does. Only capitalism exalts the individual amidst personal liberty and allows each person to achieve his or her full potential.
Worst of all, this controversy encourages misery, poverty and the destruction of human lives. Jesus Christ is weeping in heaven hearing Christians espouse a socialist philosophy that has created suffering and poverty around the world. It is impossible to love one’s neighbor as yourself without fighting against socialism, meaning government meddling in private lives.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/jesus-christ-is-a-capitalist/#TOaxruRiPXGUxBu3.99
By Jonathan Moseley
We discover in the New Testament, in Luke Chapter 12:13-14:
“Someone in the crowd said to Him [Jesus Christ], ‘Teacher, tell my brother to divide the family inheritance with me.’ But He said to him, ‘Man, who appointed Me a judge or arbitrator over you?’”
In just one verse, we see that God rejects the left-wing “Jesus Christ supported socialism” heresy. When Jesus was asked to support redistribution of wealth – to tell one brother to share the family inheritance with the other – Jesus refused. Jesus would never support government or a church stealing property by force to give it to a stranger. He would not even intervene for one man to share his own family’s wealth with his own brother.
Obviously, Jesus would sternly warn the brother hoarding wealth against greed, dishonesty and defrauding his family. But Jesus preached to the person in front of him about how to live right.  Jesus was never teaching one person what is wrong with someone else (except to clarify how the listener should behave by contrast).
One truth shines out from the Bible: Jesus spoke to the individual, never to government or government policy. Jesus was a capitalist, preaching personal responsibility, not a socialist.
Pope Francis condemned capitalism. Some argue that Francis’ Spanish-language Apostolic Exhortation was mistranslated. But Francis is not among those disputing that translation.  Moreover, corrected translations are no better.
Francis argues for dependence upon government to redistribute wealth. And con artists in the U.S. are seizing on the opportunity to spread the misery of socialism. Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin this week called Pope Francis on his mangling of economics. Then author Reza Aslan struck back in the Washington Post, claiming that Jesus was a socialist.
But we have to define our terms:
  • By “socialism,” we must understand “theft.” A socialist government uses brute force, backed up by guns, to steal property from some people to give it to others.Pope Francis reflects the wish that governments might better organize society. But governments cannot do that apart from the threat of violence to enforce their schemes. Would Jesus endorse the violence needed for government intervention?
  • By capitalism, we mean individual initiative under freedom, with the right to use what people own and to reap the fruits of one’s labor and initiative. Capitalist business must necessarily benefit society, because private businesses have no power to force anyone to buy their products or services. The consumer is king. Consumers won’t buy unless the purchase benefits them. To reinforce that central pillar of capitalism, laws against lying and fraud are proper and necessary. The consumer must be able to know and understand what he is buying and what it truly costs. The same applies to employment.
  • We reject crony capitalism and monopolies. That is what the Vatican obviously believes capitalism means. When corrupt governments are entangled with businesses, then transactions are no longer voluntary. Crony capitalism is what most people experience in Francis’ native Argentina, throughout Latin America and much of the Third World. The benefit to society is absent without informed consent.
We know that Jesus condemns crony capitalism. That’s partly what the incident at the temple was all about in Matthew 21, when Jesus overturned the tables of money-changers. Some think money-changers were bankers. Actually they exchanged one currency for another. The temple priests required that special temple coins had to be used to give mandatory tithes. So worshipers had to exchange their secular money. But the money-changers were defrauding people with a dishonest exchange rate.
Yet Jesus specifically supported the concept of capitalism. In Matthew 25:15-18, Jesus teaches what the (His) Kingdom of God is like:
“To one he gave five talents, to another, two, and to another, one, each according to his own ability; and he went on his journey. Immediately the one who had received the five talents went and traded with them, and gained five more talents. In the same manner the one who had received the two talents gained two more. But he who received the one talent went away, and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money.”
Jesus is clearly using money as a metaphor for making the most of all of life’s opportunities, abilities and moments. Yet in teaching us how we should live, Jesus agrees that a man who traded with investment capital and earned profits is praised and rewarded by his master, a type for God, and given increased authority. Most striking is what Jesus says to the man who was too afraid to take a chance with the one talent of gold entrusted to him. Jesus endorses the concept of earning interest for profit.
Matthew 25:27-28: “Then you ought to have put my money in the bank, and on my arrival I would have received my money back with interest. Therefore take away the talent from him, and give it to the one who has the ten talents.”
By contrast, in any of the versions, in paragraph 202, Pope Francis attacks markets. In paragraph 204, the pope explicitly rejects the “invisible hand” of the market, which has created the greatest prosperity in human history, as a “poison.”
In paragraph 58, Pope Francis argues that reform requires “an energetic change of attitude on the part of political leaders.” That directly contradicts Jesus’ strategy of changing individual hearts one soul at a time. The Pope’s Apostolic Exhortation was titled “The Joy of Evangelism.” If Francis had stayed focused on encouraging evangelism, that would have served both God and man. The Catholic Church does not seem to really believe that evangelism can improve society.
In paragraph 55, Francis blames poverty and unequal wealth on “ideologies which defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation.” But there was also poverty in Jesus’ day, when government tightly regulated the economy.
In paragraph 56, Francis argues for government management of business, condemning as sinful and as “tyranny” those who “reject the right of states, entrusted to watch for the common good, to exercise any form of control” over the economy. Paragraphs 58 and 205 are similar. The pope says capitalism “tends to devour everything in order to yield increased profits.”
In John 18:36, “Jesus answered, ‘My kingdom is not of this world.’” Everyone kept confusing what Jesus was saying as being political, to change government leaders or its philosophy. In Acts 1, the disciples wanted to know if – finally – Jesus was going to change the governance of Israel by overthrowing the Romans. Jesus rebuffed such ideas:
Acts 1:6-7: “So when they had come together, they were asking Him, saying, ‘Lord, is it at this time You are restoring the kingdom to Israel?’ He said to them, ‘It is not for you to know times or epochs which the Father has fixed by His own authority …’”
In paragraphs 57 and 203, Pope Francis decries capitalism for its “manipulation and debasement of the person.” Yet that is exactly what socialism does. Only capitalism exalts the individual amidst personal liberty and allows each person to achieve his or her full potential.
Worst of all, this controversy encourages misery, poverty and the destruction of human lives. Jesus Christ is weeping in heaven hearing Christians espouse a socialist philosophy that has created suffering and poverty around the world. It is impossible to love one’s neighbor as yourself without fighting against socialism, meaning government meddling in private lives.

Jonathon Moseley is a Virginia business and criminal defense attorney. Moseley is also a co-host with the “Conservative Commandos” radio show, a member of the Northern Virginia Tea Party and executive director of American Border Control. He studied Physics at Hampshire College, earned a degree in Finance from the University of Florida and a law degree from George Mason University in Virginia. Moseley promoted Reagan’s anti-missile defense plans and foreign policy at High Frontier and the Center for Peace in Freedom. He worked five years at the U.S. Department of Education, including at the Center for Choice in Education.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/jesus-christ-is-a-capitalist/#TOaxruRiPXGUxBu3.99
We discover in the New Testament, in Luke Chapter 12:13-14:
“Someone in the crowd said to Him [Jesus Christ], ‘Teacher, tell my brother to divide the family inheritance with me.’ But He said to him, ‘Man, who appointed Me a judge or arbitrator over you?’”
In just one verse, we see that God rejects the left-wing “Jesus Christ supported socialism” heresy. When Jesus was asked to support redistribution of wealth – to tell one brother to share the family inheritance with the other – Jesus refused. Jesus would never support government or a church stealing property by force to give it to a stranger. He would not even intervene for one man to share his own family’s wealth with his own brother.
Obviously, Jesus would sternly warn the brother hoarding wealth against greed, dishonesty and defrauding his family. But Jesus preached to the person in front of him about how to live right.  Jesus was never teaching one person what is wrong with someone else (except to clarify how the listener should behave by contrast).
One truth shines out from the Bible: Jesus spoke to the individual, never to government or government policy. Jesus was a capitalist, preaching personal responsibility, not a socialist.
Pope Francis condemned capitalism. Some argue that Francis’ Spanish-language Apostolic Exhortation was mistranslated. But Francis is not among those disputing that translation.  Moreover, corrected translations are no better.
Francis argues for dependence upon government to redistribute wealth. And con artists in the U.S. are seizing on the opportunity to spread the misery of socialism. Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin this week called Pope Francis on his mangling of economics. Then author Reza Aslan struck back in the Washington Post, claiming that Jesus was a socialist.
But we have to define our terms:
  • By “socialism,” we must understand “theft.” A socialist government uses brute force, backed up by guns, to steal property from some people to give it to others.Pope Francis reflects the wish that governments might better organize society. But governments cannot do that apart from the threat of violence to enforce their schemes. Would Jesus endorse the violence needed for government intervention?
  • By capitalism, we mean individual initiative under freedom, with the right to use what people own and to reap the fruits of one’s labor and initiative. Capitalist business must necessarily benefit society, because private businesses have no power to force anyone to buy their products or services. The consumer is king. Consumers won’t buy unless the purchase benefits them. To reinforce that central pillar of capitalism, laws against lying and fraud are proper and necessary. The consumer must be able to know and understand what he is buying and what it truly costs. The same applies to employment.
  • We reject crony capitalism and monopolies. That is what the Vatican obviously believes capitalism means. When corrupt governments are entangled with businesses, then transactions are no longer voluntary. Crony capitalism is what most people experience in Francis’ native Argentina, throughout Latin America and much of the Third World. The benefit to society is absent without informed consent.
We know that Jesus condemns crony capitalism. That’s partly what the incident at the temple was all about in Matthew 21, when Jesus overturned the tables of money-changers. Some think money-changers were bankers. Actually they exchanged one currency for another. The temple priests required that special temple coins had to be used to give mandatory tithes. So worshipers had to exchange their secular money. But the money-changers were defrauding people with a dishonest exchange rate.
Yet Jesus specifically supported the concept of capitalism. In Matthew 25:15-18, Jesus teaches what the (His) Kingdom of God is like:
“To one he gave five talents, to another, two, and to another, one, each according to his own ability; and he went on his journey. Immediately the one who had received the five talents went and traded with them, and gained five more talents. In the same manner the one who had received the two talents gained two more. But he who received the one talent went away, and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money.”
Jesus is clearly using money as a metaphor for making the most of all of life’s opportunities, abilities and moments. Yet in teaching us how we should live, Jesus agrees that a man who traded with investment capital and earned profits is praised and rewarded by his master, a type for God, and given increased authority. Most striking is what Jesus says to the man who was too afraid to take a chance with the one talent of gold entrusted to him. Jesus endorses the concept of earning interest for profit.
Matthew 25:27-28: “Then you ought to have put my money in the bank, and on my arrival I would have received my money back with interest. Therefore take away the talent from him, and give it to the one who has the ten talents.”
By contrast, in any of the versions, in paragraph 202, Pope Francis attacks markets. In paragraph 204, the pope explicitly rejects the “invisible hand” of the market, which has created the greatest prosperity in human history, as a “poison.”
In paragraph 58, Pope Francis argues that reform requires “an energetic change of attitude on the part of political leaders.” That directly contradicts Jesus’ strategy of changing individual hearts one soul at a time. The Pope’s Apostolic Exhortation was titled “The Joy of Evangelism.” If Francis had stayed focused on encouraging evangelism, that would have served both God and man. The Catholic Church does not seem to really believe that evangelism can improve society.
In paragraph 55, Francis blames poverty and unequal wealth on “ideologies which defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation.” But there was also poverty in Jesus’ day, when government tightly regulated the economy.
In paragraph 56, Francis argues for government management of business, condemning as sinful and as “tyranny” those who “reject the right of states, entrusted to watch for the common good, to exercise any form of control” over the economy. Paragraphs 58 and 205 are similar. The pope says capitalism “tends to devour everything in order to yield increased profits.”
In John 18:36, “Jesus answered, ‘My kingdom is not of this world.’” Everyone kept confusing what Jesus was saying as being political, to change government leaders or its philosophy. In Acts 1, the disciples wanted to know if – finally – Jesus was going to change the governance of Israel by overthrowing the Romans. Jesus rebuffed such ideas:
Acts 1:6-7: “So when they had come together, they were asking Him, saying, ‘Lord, is it at this time You are restoring the kingdom to Israel?’ He said to them, ‘It is not for you to know times or epochs which the Father has fixed by His own authority …’”
In paragraphs 57 and 203, Pope Francis decries capitalism for its “manipulation and debasement of the person.” Yet that is exactly what socialism does. Only capitalism exalts the individual amidst personal liberty and allows each person to achieve his or her full potential.
Worst of all, this controversy encourages misery, poverty and the destruction of human lives. Jesus Christ is weeping in heaven hearing Christians espouse a socialist philosophy that has created suffering and poverty around the world. It is impossible to love one’s neighbor as yourself without fighting against socialism, meaning government meddling in private lives.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/jesus-christ-is-a-capitalist/#TOaxruRiPXGUxBu3.99

We discover in the New Testament, Luke Chapter 12: 
 
13 Someone in the crowd said to Him [Jesus Christ], ‘Teacher, tell my brother to divide the family inheritance with me.’ 14 But He said to him, ‘Man, who appointed Me a judge or arbitrator over you?’”
 
            In just one verse, we see that God rejects the left-wing “Jesus Christ supported socialism” heresy.   When Jesus was asked to support redistribution of wealth, to tell one brother to share the family inheritance with the other, Jesus refused.  Jesus would never support government or a church stealing property by force to give it to a stranger.  He would not intervene for one man to share his own family’s wealth with his own brother.
 
Obviously, Jesus would sternly warn the brother hoarding wealth against greed, dishonesty, and defrauding his family.  But Jesus preached to the person in front of him about how to live right.  Jesus was never teaching one person what is wrong with someone else (except to clarify how the listener should behave by contrast).
 
One truth shines out from the Bible:  Jesus spoke to the individual, never to government or government policy.  Jesus Christ was a capitalist, preaching personal responsibility, not a socialist. 
 
Pope Francis condemned capitalism.  Some argue http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/11/29/Has-Pope-Francis-Message-Been-Lost-in-Translation that Francis’s Spanish-language Apostolic Exhortation was mis-translated.  But Francis is not among those disputing that translation.  Moreover, corrected translations http://jmgarciaiii.blogspot.com/2013/11/evangelii-gaudium-or-i-cant-believe-im.html are no better. 
 
Francis argues for dependence upon government to redistribute wealth.  And con-artists in the U.S.A. are seizing on the opportunity to spread the misery of socialism.  Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin this week called Pope Francis on his mangling of economics.  Then author Reza Aslan struck back in The Washington Post http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-faith/wp/2013/11/28/if-rush-limbaugh-and-sarah-palin-dont-like-the-pope-they-wont-care-much-for-jesus/ claiming that Jesus was a socialist.
 
But we have to define our terms: 
 
·         By ‘socialism’ we must understand ‘theft.’  A socialist government uses brute force, backed by guns, to steal property from some people to give it to others. 
 
Pope Francis reflects the wish that governments might better organize society.  But governments cannot do that apart from the threat of violence to enforce their schemes.  Would Jesus endorse the violence needed for government intervention?
 
·         By capitalism we mean individual initiative under freedom, with the right to use what people own and to reap the fruits of one’s labor and initiative.   Capitalist business must necessarily benefit society, because private businesses have no power to force anyone to buy their products or services.  The consumer is king. 
 
Consumers won’t buy unless the purchase benefits them.  To reinforce that central pillar of capitalism, laws against cheating, lying, and fraud are proper and necessary.  The consumer must be able to know and understand what he is buying and what it truly costs.  The same applies to employment.
 
·         We reject crony capitalism and monopolies.  That is what the Vatican obviously believes capitalism means.  When corrupt governments are entangled with businesses, then transactions are no longer voluntary.  Crony capitalism is what most people experience in Francis’ native Argentina, throughout Latin America, and much of the Third World.  The benefit to society is absent without informed consent.
 
We know that Jesus condemns crony capitalism.  That’s partly what the incident at the temple was all about in Matthew 21, when Jesus overturned the tables of money-changers.  Some think money-changers were bankers.  Actually they exchanged one currency for another.  The temple priests required that special temple coins be used to pay mandatory tithes.  So worshippers had to exchange their secular money.  But the money-changers were defrauding people with a dishonest exchange rate.
 
Yet Jesus specifically supported the concept of capitalism.  In Matthew 25, Jesus teaches what the (His) Kingdom of God is like:
 
“15 To one he gave five talents, to another, two, and to another, one, each according to his own ability; and he went on his journey. 16 Immediately the one who had received the five talents went and traded with them, and gained five more talents. 17 In the same manner the one who had received the two talents gained two more. 18 But he who received the one talent went away, and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money.”
 
Jesus is clearly using money as a metaphor for making the most of all of life’s opportunities, abilities, and moments.  Yet in teaching us how we should live, Jesus agrees that a man who traded with investment capital and earned profits is praised and rewarded with paradise by his master, a type for God, and given increased authority.  Most striking is what Jesus says to the man who was too afraid to take a chance with the one talent of gold entrusted to him. Jesus endorses the concept of earning interest for profit. 
 
Matthew 25:  27 Then you ought to have put my money in the bank, and on my arrival I would have received my money back with interest. 28 Therefore take away the talent from him, and give it to the one who has the ten talents.” 
 
By contrast, in any of the versions, in paragraph 202, Pope Francis attacks markets.  In paragraph 204, the Pope explicitly rejects the “invisible hand” of the market, which has created the greatest prosperity in human history, as a “poison.”
 
In paragraph 58, Pope Francis argues that reform requires “an energetic change of attitude on the part of political leaders.”   That directly contradicts Jesus’ strategy of changing individual hearts one soul at a time.  The Pope’s Apostolic Exhortation http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium_en.pdf was titled “The Joy of Evangelism.”  If Francis had stayed focused on encouraging evangelism that would have served both God and Man.  The Catholic Church does not seem to truly believe that evangelism can improve society.
 
In paragraph 55, Francis blames poverty and unequal wealth on “ideologies which defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation.”  But there was also poverty in Jesus’ day, when government tightly regulated the economy.
 
In paragraph 56, Francis argues for government management of business, condemning as sinful and as “tyranny” those who “reject the right of states, entrusted to watch for the common good, to exercise any form of control” over the economy.   Paragraphs 58 and 205 are similar.  The Pope says that capitalism “tends to devour everything in order to yield increased profits.”
 
In John 18:36, “Jesus answered, ‘My kingdom is not of this world.’”   Everyone kept confusing what Jesus was saying as being political, to change government leaders or its philosophy.  In Acts 1, the disciples wanted to know if – finally – Jesus was going to change the governance of Israel by overthrowing the Romans.   Jesus rebuffed such ideas:
 
Acts 1:  So when they had come together, they were asking Him, saying, ‘Lord, is it at this time You are restoring the kingdom to Israel?’  He said to them, ‘It is not for you to know times or epochs which the Father has fixed by His own authority; ….’” 
 
In paragraphs 57 and 203, Pope Francis decries capitalism for its “manipulation and debasement of the person.”  Yet that is exactly what socialism does.  Only capitalism exalts the individual amidst personal liberty and allows each person to achieve his or her full potential.
 
Worst of all, this controversy encourages misery, poverty, and the destruction of human lives.  Jesus Christ is weeping in heaven hearing Christians espouse a socialist philosophy that has created suffering and poverty around the world.   It is impossible to love one’s neighbor as yourself without fighting against socialism, meaning government meddling in private lives.
 
Exclusive: Jonathon Moseley sets pope straight on Bible's condemnation of socialism
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/jesus-christ-is-a-capitalist/#TOaxruRiPXGUxBu3.99

Exclusive: Jonathon Moseley sets pope straight on Bible's condemnation of socialism
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/jesus-christ-is-a-capitalist/#TOaxruRiPXGUxBu3.99

Exclusive: Jonathon Moseley sets pope straight on Bible's condemnation of socialism
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/jesus-christ-is-a-capitalist/#TOaxruRiPXGUxBu3.99
Exclusive: Jonathon Moseley sets pope straight on Bible's condemnation of socialism
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/jesus-christ-is-a-capitalist/#TOaxruRiPXGUxBu3.99

Exclusive: Jonathon Moseley sets pope straight on Bible's condemnation of socialism
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/jesus-christ-is-a-capitalist/#TOaxruRiPXGUxBu3.99